Search for: "United States v. Anthony May" Results 441 - 460 of 1,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm by Ilya Somin
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has already ruled that at least some asset forfeitures are covered by the Clause in the 1998 case of United States v. [read post]
At the time of his alleged violation of the state’s civil rights statute, Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages as a matter of state law, and the United States Supreme Court had said nothing to suggest that limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm by Mark Walsh
The state may reasonably decide that the interior of the polling place should reflect that distinction. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a case about tribal fishing rights, the judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided court. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, “involves the privacy implications of our rapidly evolving use of technology in the digital age — and the need for our laws to evolve in tandem. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court predictably handed down the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm by Ilya Somin
The author of today's decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy, may well turn out to be a key swing voter in the travel ban case. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:29 am by Franck Wobst
By Franck Wobst On Monday, May 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 5-to-4 decision that employers may require workers to accept individual arbitration for wage and hour and other workplace disputes rather than banding together to pursue their claims in class actions in federal or state courts. [read post]