Search for: "United States v. Barnett"
Results 441 - 460
of 598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
In recent years, these ideas have been given renewed attention in work by Jack Rakove, Joseph Lynch, Jack Balkin, Kurt Lash, Robert Cooter & Neil Siegal, and many other writers, including my friend and colleague Randy Barnett. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:30 am
West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:10 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Holder, and HHS v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
Daniel Barnett’s regular news alert brought the case of Aberdeen City Council v McNeill to my attention. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
" The foundation for regime theory is the simple observation that the Constitution of the United States was adopted in several pieces--the Constitution of 1789 was supplemented by a variety of amendments. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
Unconstitutional to Consider Husband’s Refusal to Give Religious Divorce (Get) When Granting Support
29 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides inter alia that Congress “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
“The fact that this decision was apparently political, rather than legal, completely undermines its legitimacy as a precedent,” vented Randy Barnett, counsel for the Republican state officials who brought the case. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
The National Security Communications Unit is said to be dedicated to “combating disinformation by state actors and others. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
I don’t see how one can easily extrapolate from Citizens United to a willingness to enlist in Randy Barnett’s campaign in behalf of a thoroughly tendentious “fundamental values” theory of the Constitution. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
Babak Sarani, et al., Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States, 228 J. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
