Search for: "United States v. Born" Results 441 - 460 of 2,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2009, 2:33 pm
In Maryland, a wrongful birth case is a case in which parents of a child born with birth defects allege that the negligence of prenatal health care providers deprived them of the opportunity to terminate the pregnancy due to the likelihood of the child being born in an impaired state. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 9:30 pm
 Aside from Native Americans, all others  residing in the United States  are born abroad or are  descended from immigrants. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
But, while the Citizenship Clause requires the government to grant citizenship to people born in the United States, it does not require denying it to would-be immigrants. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:32 am by Lyle Denniston
”  In making that plea, the government lawyers had relied upon a sweeping statement by the Court, in the 1936 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) [Germany][Petition granted] [Habitual residence]   In Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) Asli Baz, a citizen of Germany, filed suit seeking to compel Anthony Patterson, a citizen of the United States, to return their six-year-old son, A.P., from Illinois to Germany. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a dispute over the constitutionality of a statute that imposes more stringent residency requirements on unmarried U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:30 am by ernst
She was denied again on appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States in Bradwell v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 646, 647, 655–56 (2009); United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:50 am
 This provision states that: "Member States shall ensure that reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses incurred by the successful party shall, as a general rule, be borne by the unsuccessful party, unless equity does not allow this. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]