Search for: "United States v. Certain Accounts"
Results 441 - 460
of 4,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2018, 11:29 am
You might be aware that the President of the United States has a Twitter account. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2004, 2:55 pm
However, for those that are not, and wish an easy reading recent case from the First Circuit that will give you some idea of how it operates post-CAFRA (Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000), I refer you to today's opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
The requirement of authentication is thus a condition precedent to admitting evidence” (United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Rubio, it would “empower state and local governments in the United States to counter the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement’s discriminatory economic warfare against the Jewish state. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Defendants have asserted a counterclaim for account stated. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:03 pm
It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:13 am
President Bush attempted to enforce this decision against the States by asking them to follow the decision: I have determined, pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, that the United States will discharge its international obligations under the decision of the International Court of Justice in the Case Concerning Avena … by having State courts give effect to the… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
United States (W.D. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:11 am
Facts: This case (Kerek v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:52 pm
Apple is facing class actions over its App Store terms that it may not be able to settle as cheaply as with certain "developer plaintiffs" in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 1:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Sun Sun Lin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
The Court will hear argument tomorrow in No. 05-3152, United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:52 am
Clement filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court siding with non-issuer defendants in a securities class action case. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 9:32 am
This decision comes on the heels of a similar Sixth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
