Search for: "United States v. Craig" Results 441 - 460 of 732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm by Bob Bauer, Jack Goldsmith
  (Our analysis builds on the excellent work in the last few days by (among others) Matthew Seligman (see here, here, here, and here); Protect Democracy; Andy Craig; Derek Muller; Ned Foley, Michael McConnell, Derek Muller, Brad Smith, and Rick Pildes; and Henry Olsen. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The defendants were convicted and, relying upon its own precedent in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Ehrman, Southern Methodist University School of Law, and Robin Kundis Craig, USC Gould School of Law EPA’s regulatory authority is limited by the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “waters of the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use  in the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm by Lara Fowler
Edwin Kneedler, deputy solicitor general, argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October  Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October  Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October  Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October  Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]