Search for: "United States v. Dutch" Results 441 - 460 of 768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 4:14 pm by Tyler Giannini and Susan Farbstein
The young United States did not wish to harbor a pirate or slave trader considered the enemy of all mankind. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:37 am by Oona Hathaway
The First Congress of the United States enacted the ATS to ensure that U.S. courts could enforce international law. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am by Julian Ku
  It is a law of the United States, which authorizes courts to apply domestic American law to activities with some substantial connection to the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Eugene Kontorovich (Northwestern) — who has guest-blogged here several times — passes along this item about today’s United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
The Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:47 pm by Trey Childress
Related posts: New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed United States Supreme Court to Again Consider the Alien Tort Statute Is it the End of the Alien Tort Statute? [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
Although many of the briefs filed in the Kiobel litigation take the “binary approach,” the briefs of the United States did not. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am by Conor McEvily
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States and First American Financial v. [read post]