Search for: "United States v. Flood"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
See Leser v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:30 pm
" United States ex. rel. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:42 pm
United States ex. rel. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 11:56 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) (federal agency informed property owner that it could not exclude the public from a navigable marina); Loretto v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:09 am
” Ackerson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:15 am
Since that time, the CAFC issued an unsatisfying divided opinion, and then last week, the Supreme Court of the United States finally decided the issue. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
In particular, the constitutional challenge ultimately rests on a flawed premise—that if Congress can require people to buy a good or service solely because they are living in the United States, the commerce clause will be converted into an expansive power to compel just about any purchase. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Heller, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects “the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
United Healthcare, the U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm
Citing the Supreme Court of the United States, the majority opinion notes that the statutory text of Title VII is not limited to economic or tangible discrimination. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled this Wednesday that section 3 of DOMA violates the Constitution. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am
Grayson Clary summarized the Fourth Circuit’s May 9 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:47 am
” The United States distinguishes the early cases Knick relies on. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
United States (No. 11-9307) (case page forthcoming), in which it will consider how to treat an error that becomes plain during the appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
United States (No. 11-9307) (case page forthcoming), in which it will consider how to treat an error that becomes plain during the appeal. [read post]
