Search for: "United States v. Grant, III"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2015, 3:37 pm
” The states’ brief in the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all eight claims in Low v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:11 pm
It begins:Every first-year law student learns that the United States Supreme Court only presides over real “cases” and “controversies,” according to the Constitution in Article III, Section 2. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:23 am
At the weak end, it included the question of whether the Third Amendment applies to the states, a matter is that is of no apparent interest to the United States and has no prospective effect on it. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:50 am
A supporter of this bill stated that it was intended to “address the Supreme Court's flawed decision in Riegel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 2:24 pm
A recent United States Supreme Court decision has forced the United States to take a hard look at the worldwide global warming phenomenon, and the U.S.'s contributions thereto. [1] In Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
III. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 2:28 pm
On January 24, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Thompson v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 11:02 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:08 pm
United States, the Supreme Court granted district courts broad discretion in imposing sentences in an effort to create a sentencing scheme complying with the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
United States, 54 App. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm
(See Azar v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:25 am
The Missouri federal court noted that in a diversity case, “a federal court may not address a party’s claims unless the party establishes standing to sue under both Article III of the United States Constitution and the relevant state law. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
§ 1441(a), which allows removal of civil actions “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
” In granting the motion, the Court noted that although Teller refused to appear for a deposition or trial, “[t]here is no suggestion of cost, immigration, illness, infirmity, or other barriers to appearing in the United States. [read post]
