Search for: "United States v. Guy" Results 441 - 460 of 1,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2016, 6:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court says it had no choice; the Fourth Amendment compels this result.The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:54 pm by Jeff Gamso
  That's why the cases are called things like City of ____________ or State of __________ or United States of America v. __________________.I understand why the victims of criminal acts hate that. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:16 am by SHG
At The Watch, Radley Balko dissects the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am by SHG
United States, the law at stake was the Armed Career Criminal Act, and let’s face it, who loves armed career criminals? [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:08 am by Susan Brenner
She sent the request to “a member of the Executive Protection Unit (EPU) of the Washington State Patrol. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm
  Sometimes experience is good, and sometimes it's good to instead get someone who perhaps brings a fresh perspective that's not been formed (and/or jaded) by prior work in the area.Which is why, for example, we don't have any service qualifications to become, say, President of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:59 pm by Ryan Singel
Photo: The Anonymous group adopted the Guy Fawkes mask, a la V for Vendetta. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:00 am by Beck/Herrmann
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:53 am by Eric
The court makes its expectation clear: "Any amended complaint must identify a specific act of infringement that occurred entirely within the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:27 am by SHG
When the United States Supreme Court takes a case and rules, it applies to all. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:04 am by Harry Graver
Al Jazeera has suggested that the United States has the wrong guy. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm
 "In this case, the majority ignores United States Supreme Court precedent and our own Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) precedent and thus fails to maintain the uniformity of the courts’ decisions. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:42 am by Jeff Gamso
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.And it's been settled (although sometimes unsettling) since Marbury v. [read post]