Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 441 - 460
of 12,884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
In Hunter v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:42 pm
” SB 10 by Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) creates a voluntary process for local governments to access a streamlined zoning process for new multi-unit housing near transit or in urban infill areas, with up to 10 units per parcel. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:01 am
A Maui property owner challenged the County's "workforce housing" exaction ordinance, which requires a property owner to commit 40% to 50% of the units in most new housing developments to below-market-rate ownership or rental. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:49 am
Additional Resources: Williams v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:58 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:37 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Warley, the Supreme Court invalidated a Louisville residential segregation law, one of a wave of such laws spreading through the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:26 pm
The Act is intended to strengthen the scope of the Economic Espionage Act to prevent results like the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]