Search for: "United States v. Houston"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 4:30 pm
Br. of United States, Polaris v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
The style of the case is, KLM Resources, LLC d/b/a Jan-Pro Houston v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 7:07 pm
H-16-1053.United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
By Sarah Steward-Lindsey In ERG Resources, LLC v. [read post]
Father's Day behind bars, Michael Morton documentary, endangered Texas courthouses and other stories
18 Jun 2012, 5:53 am
Quite often, it should be noted, TDCJ units are the largest water uses in their jurisdictions, something that began to put pressure on some rural water systems during last year's drought.Make 'em prove itDefense attorney Adam Reposa calls for attorneys to take more cases to trial to force the state to pay full freight for high incarceration volumes.Steroids case v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm
The Appeals Court explains that two sets of petitioners, hereinafter referred to as "Industry Petitioners" and "Environmental Petitioners," seek review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule partially approving and partially disapproving the most recent revision to Texas's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) pursuant to the Clean Air Act… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 7:10 am
This was made clear in the 1982, Houston 14th Court of Appeals opinion styled, Parchman v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:24 pm
--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004) The landmark United States Supreme Court case of Miranda v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm
On August 3, 2011, Litepanels, Inc. of Van Nuys, California and Litepanels, Ltd. of the United Kingdom (collectively, “Litepanels”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:03 am
But in a January ruling, Judge Keith Ellison of United States District Court lamented that even though he was concerned Mr. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
Federalism by Jury in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:37 pm
Pileggi of Fox Rothschild in his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog Krupski v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm
Another reason is -- if you live and commute along the United States-Mexico border -- it gives Border Patrol agents another reason to search your car. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:21 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
