Search for: "United States v. Mohamed" Results 441 - 460 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 3:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The opinion’s introduction reads: Petitioner Fayiz Mohammed Ahmed Al Kandari (“AI Kandari”) has been detained by the United States Government at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba since 2002. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:44 am by Robert Chesney
Post-game analysis of the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in Mohamed v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:53 pm by zshapiro
While some of the Circuit judges wanted to base the decision on Toten the majority instead based the decision on United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm by Jeralyn
In Afghanistan Mohamed was tortured and inhumanely treated by United States officials. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
The five dissenting judges argued that this “evidentiary privilege” — traced to the Supreme Court’s 1953 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am by Adam Wagner
Ms Sumaiya Patel, the former wife of Mohammed Sidique Khan, had her initial application for funding to the Lord Chancellor refused. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm by Isabel McArdle
The third section of the article focuses on ongoing litigation in Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State and Al Rawi v Secretary of State, where the Claimants attempt to expose the role played by the British Government in their detention at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
And given the ostensible justification -- stated fears of trying these particular defendants on American soil -- the changes would undermine the authority and legitimacy of all federal courts in the United States.? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:11 am by Anna Su
The common thread running throughout the essays in this book was the turn to law of each of these four groups: the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Protestants and Other Americans United for the Separation of Church and State (POAU), the Nation of Islam, the Concerned Women for America (CWA) and the Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry (RCFM). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
While the order did not say that Kessler could not hold a hearing on Mohammed’s plea not to be sent to Algeria, it specified that the judge was to rule on that issue “withour requiring testimony from Special Envoy Fried or any other United States government official. [read post]