Search for: "United States v. Obey"
Results 441 - 460
of 613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
The Republicans could demand, say, a constitutional amendment overruling Roe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:01 am
Professor Buchanan cites Perry v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
United States, the Supreme Court used the words “obligation” and “debt” interchangeably. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 6:07 pm
In Clinton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm
United States, the Supreme Court used the words “obligation” and “debt” interchangeably. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 2:33 pm
In Clinton v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
First, there is the quite stunning concurrence by three judges of the Texas State Court of Criminal Appeals, which explicitly adopts the concurring opinion of Justice Sevens in the Medellin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:57 am
A memo from the President doesn't do it.My own view is that Congress can and should implement the obligation of the United States under the Optional Protocol to obey the decision of the ICJ, even though erroneous, in the cases directly involved in that decision. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:00 pm
United States Trustee, --- F.3d ----, D. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
United States, 197 U.S. 207; Bailey v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:02 pm
United States. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:31 pm
(David Kopel) City of New York v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 2:40 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our judgment and remanded this case to us for further consideration in light of Florida v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
This case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, on April 13, 2011. [read post]
