Search for: "United States v. Ocean" Results 441 - 460 of 789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2013, 6:42 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 8:50 pm by National Indian Law Library
Dep't of Interior (wind turbines, cultural impacts)* State Courts Bulletin Cases featured:Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:55 am by WIMS
      The majority also notes that, "Because neither the United States nor Japan recognizes Australia's jurisdiction over any portion of the Southern Ocean, Cetacean owes no respect to the Australian order." [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:42 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Department of Energy, "20% Wind Energy by 2030" (July 2008), stated that such European shallow-water technology is too expensive and too difficult to site in U.S. waters. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:35 pm
., Ocean Peace, Inc., and United States Seafoods, LLC, have each been fined by the EPA for violations of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:35 pm
., Ocean Peace, Inc., and United States Seafoods, LLC, have each been fined by the EPA for violations of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:41 pm
  Failure to have health insurance coverage would result in personal tax penalties from the state. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Maritime Law Staff
It is days like today that makes me proud to be a member of the United States Navy and this coalition. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
  Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:13 pm by Dwight Sullivan
One of the most closely watched CAAF cases in recent years has been United States v. [read post]