Search for: "United States v. Park" Results 441 - 460 of 4,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:05 pm by John Ross
Do foreign nationals have a due-process right to enter the United States to attend a civil-forfeiture trial involving their property? [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:33 am by Pamela Wolf
The assistant prosecutor sued, claiming that the ECPO violated the United States Constitution’s Free Exercise Clause and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Richard Briffault
The administration of elections in the United States—including elections for federal office—is highly decentralized. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:27 am
Parke Davis, Inc., 746 F.2d 517, 520 (9th Cir. 1984) (“The United States was unaware that Mr. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:06 pm by John Ross
Dissent: The First Amendment doesn't protect foreigners outside the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am by INFORRM
In the case of Ness v City of Bloomington, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the city’s ordinance banning photography and videorecording in public parks is unconstitutional. [read post]