Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 441 - 460 of 20,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:03 pm by Gerard Magliocca
From the oral argument today, the most likely result is that the Court will either decide the case without reaching the merits or stall for as long as possible and hope that there is more information from the Department of Commerce about the count of people who are in the United States illegally. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, 15-1503, involves the rule of Brady v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Charon QC
The United States appears to have a few ‘issues’ with judicial systems that do not fall within their control. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 10:00 pm by Megan Corrarino
Today, Oct. 14, is Indigenous Peoples’ Day in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 2:24 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
Many of those people intended to seek asylum in the United States but were not allowed to even apply. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:02 am
" Today in The New York Times, Dorothy Samuels has an Editorial Observer essay that begins, "If you think Washington's culture of corruption is bad now and couldn't get appreciably worse, my hunch is you don't know about United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
Most people, understandably, see the Supreme Court of the United States as the court of last resort. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am by Nassiri Law
Dep’t of Defense, December 7, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]