Search for: "United States v. Powell" Results 441 - 460 of 834
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am by Jeff Redding
  In particular, I have been thinking about it as a result of a gut feeling that the ‘2 v. 3’ debate is largely occurring within a vacuum, with not enough attention being paid to the current (beleaguered) state of the United States’ higher education system as a whole. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
United States (University of Washington Press) by Gordon K. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Jack reflected on the significance of military commissions, particularly in light of some of last week’s events in the United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am by The Charge
  Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am by The Charge
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
This vignette takes place after the oral argument in the Watergate tapes case (United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:48 am
” Judge Black also quoted from an earlier Supreme Court opinion, in Powell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
 The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
I've added a statement on the case from The Owners' Rights Initiative, about the Supreme Court ruling that even books purchased outside the United States are subject to the 'First Sale Doctrine' as long as they are legally purchased (piracy is still a no-no), and brought into the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
  The government need only demonstrate that the surveillance targets “persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States” and seeks “foreign intelligence information. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
But he nevertheless identified a number of situations in which a party would have standing to attack the FAA: for example, if the government chose to use FAA-derived information in a judicial or administrative proceeding (as occurred in United States v. [read post]