Search for: "United States v. Sample" Results 441 - 460 of 2,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2016, 11:27 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Today, the United States Supreme Court allowed a $5.8 million verdict for unpaid overtime against Tyson Foods to stand. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:36 pm by Larry
Rather, it is classifiable in 6217.10.9530, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for "Other made up clothing accessories; parts of garments…Accessories: Other: Other: Of man-made fibers. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 1:41 pm
United States is a touchstone. 'The ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas,' he wrote. 'The best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.' The corrupt information that dominates the private square does not rise to the top of a free and fair competition of ideas. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:54 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCE: United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:54 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCE: United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
But Chief Justice Kem Thompson Frost offered up a concurrence suggesting the law and science are out of whack:In  the  forty-three  years since  the Supreme Court of the United States articulated the Biggers factors, scientists have been studying whether these factors accurately predict the reliability of a witness’s identification. [read post]