Search for: "United States v. Starks"
Results 441 - 460
of 816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2020, 8:17 am
" Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:38 pm
Under Teague v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:47 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
Note that this decision appears to stand in stark contrast to the 2008 decision in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., No. 04 Civ. 4607 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am
” The justices unanimously agreed on the judgment that the Sacketts should not have been subject to EPA authority, but there was stark disagreement over the majority’s reasoning for how to define the waters of the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981) [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm
United States Jaycees (1984), the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects certain intimate relationships, like marriage. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
The last half century has witnessed extraordinary, almost unimaginable, changes in how Americans think about the death penalty.Fifty years ago, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court brought a temporary halt to capital punishment in Furman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
John Sakson is a Shareholder and Co-Managing Direcotr of Stark & Stark’s in the firm's Lawrenceville, New Jersey office, specializing in Accident & Personal Injury Law. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
In 2005, Husband closed a successful business in New York State and relocated to South Carolina to advance Wife’s career with United States Customs and Border Protection. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:03 pm
Equality is not an option in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm
In a leading case on this issue, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am
We believe this action could be a model for future investor claims outside the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 12:03 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:02 pm
He ships it back to the United States, where it forms a small part of a very large and valuable gizmo. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
