Search for: "United States v. Treasury Employees"
Results 441 - 460
of 461
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:09 am
[17] Internal Revenue Service, United States Departmente of the Treasury, Limited Liability Company, [www.irs.gov] (last visited Nov. 3, 2007) [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 8:46 pm
This case is very similar to United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
What, you might ask, could possibly be the connection between the Bank(s) of the United States and Blackwater, the apparently lawless security force operating in Iraq? [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:58 am
United States, and FCA is ex rel. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 11:16 am
The attendance of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence may be required from any place in the United States, or any territory, possession, or commonwealth of the United States, at any designated place of hearing [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:12 am
(d) Guidelines by Attorney General Not later than one year after August 23, 1988, the Attorney General, after consultation with the Commission, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of the Treasury, and after obtaining the views of all interested persons through public notice and comment procedures, shall determine to what extent compliance with this section would be enhanced and the… [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
You remember the Branch Consultants v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
Land v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
That is in form exactly the same rationale that the Court has used in the past -- most notably, in Austin v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
LBD11739-02-7
A. 7913 2
1 supreme court shall be increased by adding thereto a percentage thereof
2 equaling the percentage by which the salary of a judge of the United
3 States district court was increased in such twelve-month period. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:06 am
Annual salaries of state-paid judges and justices of the 5 unified court system. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Finally, he requests that he be resentenced pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
In response to an inquiry about wellness program that gave non-smoking employees substantial reductions on the health insurance premiums, the E.E.O.C. stated, "It could be argued that providing a monetary incentive to successfully participate renders the program involuntary because the size of the payment must be considered. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
See also Burson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
§ 2679, requires the United States to be substituted as defendant in place of a government employee facing a common-law tort suit, if the Attorney General certifies that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment. [read post]
