Search for: "Vaughn v Vaughn"
Results 441 - 460
of 614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
Federal trial-court judge Vaughn Walker asked "What is the harm to the procreation purpose you outlined of allowing same-sex couples to get married? [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
One decision, Gill v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:47 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-3789; USA v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:10 am
District Judge Vaughn Walker, bringing the Supreme Court's language to his attention. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Many thanks to the blog reader who forwarded Chief Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 7:06 am
Vaughn, 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:22 pm
Plaintiff attorney Theodore Olson closed Perry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:06 am
Both sides expect to weather vigorous questioning under Chief Judge Vaughn Walker. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am
By the close of business, Pacific time, the case will be in the hands of Judge Vaughn Walker. [read post]
29 May 2010, 1:41 pm
The case of Vaughn v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:33 am
Koike v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:00 am
Vaughn, 1999 WL 95974, at *2. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:03 am
A Vaughn Index is an affidavit identifying withheld record, accompanied with a brief explanation of the relevant FOIA exemption’s application to the record. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
The DC Dicta blog tore the Supremes a new one for their lack of tech savvy during the sexty City of Ontario v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 10:27 am
Perry v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
(He was not a fan of the blanket policy, at least not in that case, but in Mapp v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
In Massachusetts, another federal case tests whether a federal statutory provision containing a sexual-preference distinction is constitutional.The complaint in Perry v Schwarzenneger, filed in the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
In Massachusetts, another federal case tests whether a federal statutory provision that draws a sexual-preference distiniction is constitutional.The complaint in Perry v Schwarzenneger, filed in the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
