Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re" Results 441 - 460 of 733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2012, 2:40 pm by Bexis
While it remains true that our role in bringing about the Buckman Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Whether C5 forms prior art because it was communicated to the opponent’s representative (recipient stage)[4.3] The parties admitted that there was a substantial level of co-operation between them and other professional representatives in order to create a test case. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Should treat right to copy as a co-equal participant in the system; otherwise competition simply retreats as rights expands. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Pa. 1986) ("[w]hen a liability insurer retains a lawyer to defend an insured, the insured is considered the lawyer's client") and In Re Petition of Youngblood, 895 S.W.2d 322, 328 (Tenn. 1995)(counsel's sole client is insured). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Pa. 1986) ("[w]hen a liability insurer retains a lawyer to defend an insured, the insured is considered the lawyer's client") and In Re Petition of Youngblood, 895 S.W.2d 322, 328 (Tenn. 1995)(counsel's sole client is insured). [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:23 am by Mike Aylward
Pa. 1986) ( "[w]hen a liability insurer retains a lawyer to defend an insured, the insured is considered the lawyer's client") and In Re Petition of Youngblood, 895 S.W.2d 322, 328 (Tenn. 1995)(counsel's sole client is insured). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am by Law Lady
Criminal law -- Attempted murder -- Jury instructions -- Giving of standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter is not fundamental error in prosecution for attempted first degree murder where defendant is convicted of lesser included offense of attempted second degree murder -- Conflict certifiedJEAN L. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
  For example, she wrote that “[i]t is a clearly established principle of the law of warthat detention may last no longer than active hostilities. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
  For example, she wrote that “[i]t is a clearly established principle of the law of war that detention may last no longer than active hostilities. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Unfortunately, Alison Frankel thought that drivel worthy of mention, and completed the argument that Bainbridge didn’t have the stones to spell out: So why did Strine agree to grant such exorbitant fees? [read post]