Search for: "Wait v. Second Judicial District Court" Results 441 - 460 of 611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
The challengers would have the option of appealing to the Ninth Circuit Court, or of asking the Supreme Court to take the case without waiting for a ruling by the Circuit Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
And if it was a tax, maybe the whole dispute was premature because the Tax Injunction Act required waiting until the tax was due before it could be challenged. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am by Sheppard Mullin
At the appellate level in Harris I, in a 2-1 split decision, the Second District Court of Appeal sided with the plaintiffs, holding that adjusters were non-exempt production employees. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/LLEIwp (Dean Gonsowski) Court Dismisses Countrywide Data Theft Suit - http://bit.ly/PC4fgK (Justine Gottshall) Crashing the Third Party: Experts Weigh How Far the Government Can Go in Reading Your Email -http://bit.ly/PHUzkO (Richard Brust) Days Five and Six of a Predictive Coding Narrative: Deep into the Weeds and a Computer Mind-meld Moment - http://bit.ly/NMrVLS (Ralph Losey) eDiscovery:  4 Tips for Managing the Document… [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm by Zachary Spilman
In Olano, the Supreme Court made it clear that “the [plain] error must have been prejudicial: It must have affected the outcome of the district court proceedings. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by The Complex Litigator
CLS Transportion Los Angeles, LLC (June 4, 2012), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) affirmed a trial court order granting a motion to compel arbitration and dismissing class claims. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:38 am by Eric
Additionally, as one district court noted, “modern search engines make little if any use of metatags. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am by Guest Blogger
But that dialogue begins with the second act, the proceedings before the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm by Michelle Yeary
Brady (wait a minute, didn’t Alice do all the cooking?). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
  The district court in Idaho concluded that the CWA precludes judicial review of compliance orders before the EPA has started an enforcement action in federal court, and granted the EPA’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
  The district court in Idaho concluded that the CWA precludes judicial review of compliance orders before the EPA has started an enforcement action in federal court, and granted the EPA’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This is the second of four articles that will appear on the blog this week, previewing the issues that the Court has agreed to review. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:00 am by Stephen L. Wasby
There is considerable evidence that court of appeals judges wait for the Supreme Court to act and that they do so independent of competing judicial ideologies (or “agendas”):  both “liberal” and “conservative” judges wanted to resolve key issues – such as whether a ruling on roving patrols applies to fixed checkpoints, what constitutes a fixed checkpoint, or which rulings were retroactive – so those matters… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Or what about Justices who compiled works such as those collected by Samuel Blatchford in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Second Circuit (1852-88) (24 vols.)? [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
The District Court analyzed two different issues — whether there was judicial efficiency to be served by separate appeals, and whether the plaintiffs would suffer any undue or unique prejudice were they to have to wait till after the entire trial to take up the Morrison issue. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
On November 5, 2008, the parents filed a "Petition to Determine Custody Pursuant to the [Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act]" in District Court in New Mexico against the aunt and uncle. [read post]