Search for: "Warner v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Spanish Patents and Trademark Office (SPTO) archives (Class 46) Spains 350 Super Brands revealed (Class 46)   Taiwan French luxury goods producer Hermes won a record US $7.5 million in damages in a trade mark infringement case brought against a former employee who had sold four counterfeit handbags (IPKat) (Reuters)   United Kingdom UK copyright tribunal modernisation (Excess Copyright), (IPKat) The Patents, Trade Marks and Designs (Address for… [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Target sold 140 Bruce Lee t-shirts in California, while Urban Outfitters sold 4,980 shirts California and elsewhere in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Pirate Party politician Jonas Bergling fired for his political views (TorrentFreak) Large pirate topsite ‘Sunnydale’ raided, over 65 terabytes seized (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom UK says no copyright exception for mashups (Techdirt) YouTube to block music videos to British users due to clash with PRS over UK licence (IPKat) (ContentAgenda) (ContentAgenda) (Out-Law) Featured Artists Coalition say public should not be prosecuted for downloading… [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
As stated by General Counsel for Pernod Ricard Ian FitzSimons following the Third Circuit's decision, "We are determined to continue to fight for fair competition in the United States market where ownership of the ‘Havana Club' trademar [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff'd by equally divided court, 128 S. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 3:48 am by SHG
LEGAL STANDARDS The United States conducted this investigation and review of the University under its Title IX and Title IV authority. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:27 pm by Matthew David Brozik
‘Happy Birthday to You’ belongs to you, and to me, and to every person in these United States, whether he or she has documentation or not. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:58 pm
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am by Nancy Prager
The issue as to whether or not the author of another work without permission from the copyright owner had the right to use the protected works was novel in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
The second case, IPCC v Warner ([2012] EWHC 271 (QB)) concerned an injunction prohibiting the defendants from disclosing documents and information which had been sent by the IPCC to the first defendant by mistake. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 9:06 am by Scott Hervey
For example, in the case of Chosun International, Inc. v. [read post]