Search for: "Washington v. Barnes"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
Today, the court will hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes answers three common questions about the Supreme Court in a Donald Trump administration, noting, among other things, that judicial ethics experts say “federal laws would not prohibit Trump from nominating” his sister to the court. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:53 am
Stoumbos and Visa, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who reports that Sotomayor said she “looked forward to a nomination that will restore the court to full strength. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
Additional coverage comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR and from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who notes that Miami’s “leaders have embarked on a novel and aggressive legal strategy to recoup losses” stemming from the housing collapse of 2008 “from the big banks they say created the crisis with discriminatory and predatory lending practices. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who notes that the event included “what have become familiar eulogies” to Scalia’s “writing skills and his impact on the law. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Coverage of both arguments comes from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who notes that “on Monday, one case was about a little girl and her goldendoodle service dog named Wonder, and the other about the ‘stripes, chevrons and zig-zags’ that make a cheerleader’s uniform distinctive from, say, a little black dress. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes surveys reactions to Justice Clarence Thomas’ 25th anniversary on the court, observing that “the unofficial title of the court’s most polarizing justice seems his to keep regardless of tenure. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:45 am
Controversy": Robert Barnes has this article in today's edition of The Washington Post. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am
The first is Fry v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
In an op-ed in The Washington Post, Gavin Grimm, the transgender high school student whose case stemming from his request to use the boys’ bathroom at school, Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am
” In The Washington Post, Juliet Eilperin and Robert Barnes report that the “bare-bones calendar” suggests the court may be “storing cases in hopes of having a full membership of nine by the end of the year. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:33 am
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg reports that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am
” In an op-ed in the Washington Examiner, Samuel Green weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
Robert Barnes covered the argument for The Washington Post, as did Mark Sherman and Sam Hananel for the Associated Press. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the term will begin “with the focus not on the court’s docket but on the court itself and a future that will be defined by the presidential election. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am
Salman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am
Robert Barnes also reports in The Washington Post on the court’s decision to review the trademark case, noting that the outcome will have “direct implications for the Washington Redskins in their fight to defend their famous team name,” as does Adam Liptak in The New York Times. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
