Search for: "Washington v. Oregon" Results 441 - 460 of 1,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
” He noted that in Air & Liquid Systems v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
Miers, now a private attorney in Washington, D.C.) [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:23 am by Charlotte Law Library
The state courts in New York, Oregon and Washington have concluded that their state constitutions demand that warrants must be issued first before any GPS devices can be used issued. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:00 pm by John P. Ahlers
Dear Client/Friend:For the last two years, our firm has been providing its clients and friends with regular updates of new developments effecting construction contractors, owners, subcontractors and suppliers, engineers and others involved in the construction industry in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm by Reference Staff
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:08 am by Cannabis Law Group
This ruling holds more weight than the bankruptcy court’s, both because it is now the precedent set in our jurisdiction (as well as others, including Oregon, Hawaii, Alaska and Washington). [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm by Iantha Haight
 A quick Google search brings up similar projects for Chicago and Washington D.C., as well as in Spokane, Washington, Hartford, Connecticut and Portland, Oregon, some led by local historians. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:03 am
 The unsigned ruling in Wong v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:26 pm by Andis Kaulins
Oregon: Ducks favored by 34 Our call: Oregon 44-28    Result: - New Mexico State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Google review of wedding venue qualified for Oregon anti-SLAPP protection, but the plaintiffs made their prima facie showing of defamation. * Young v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 3:01 pm by James Hastings
Applicant argued that Opposer’s common law rights and evidence were limited to Oregon and to a lesser degree Washington state only. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:46 am by Paul E. Freehling
Now, district and appellate court judges in a single federal case pending in the Northern District of California, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Sharon Armstrong
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]