Search for: "Watson Appeal"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,074
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 3:43 pm
Related Posts: Watson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:55 am
blog post by Mick Watson (in his personal capacity - but also the Director of Ark-Genomics at the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Leaving nothing to chance, Bell obtained support for its cabinet appeal from Tory and Watson, who wrote letters citing Bell’s planned investments in the cities and expressing concern that the commission ruling might delay or derail those plans. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:04 am
Leaving nothing to chance, Bell obtained support for its cabinet appeal from Tory and Watson, who wrote letters citing Bell’s planned investments in the cities and expressing concern that the commission ruling might delay or derail those plans. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 8:05 am
The Committee makes several further recommendations on this issue: to expand the right of appeal to include error of law (recommendation 70); to introduce an interim right of appeal on the ground of error of law (recommendation 71); to introduce an appeal route for cases from Scotland and Northern Ireland (recommendation 72). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:13 am
Watson, 169 N.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:19 am
Last month, I wrote about the battle over the future of broadband in Canada with Toronto Mayor John Tory and Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson writing to the federal cabinet to support a Bell appeal to overturn a CRTC decision designed to foster increased competition for fast fibre Internet services. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
Watson, 353 Or. 768, 769, 305 P.3d 94 (Oregon Supreme Court 2013). [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Watson, Jr. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
Watson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:41 am
The post The Battle Over the Future of Broadband in Canada: Mayors Tory & Watson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:29 am
Months later, Bell filed a cabinet appeal over the decision, asking the new Liberal government to overrule the CRTC. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Questions arising out of the challenge by David Davis and Tom Watson to the data retention provisions of DRIPA referred to the CJEU by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
TL and Joy Watson, the Assistant District Attorney, his possession of this exculpatory information. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
[The progress of the Bill can be tracked here.]Questions arising out of David Davis and Tom Watson MPs’ legal challenge to the data retention provisions of DRIPA have been referred to the CJEU by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
The Bill itself is expected to be introduced in Parliament in March 2016.Questions arising out of David Davis and Tom Watson MPs’ legal challenge to the data retention provisions of DRIPA have been referred to the CJEU by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
An appeal followed later in the year. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
The Davis and Watson legal challenge and appeal has scrutinised bulk retention of (and access to) communications data and its relationship to the British public’s right to respect for private life and protection of personal data under Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
However, its appeal was rejected on all grounds. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
With regard to the first of these the current law, as contained in DRIPA, is subject to an ongoing legal challenge brought by MPs David Davis and Tom Watson supported by Liberty. [read post]
