Search for: "Watson v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am by Quinta Jurecic
’” All these opinions rely heavily on McCreary County v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 6:49 pm by Maria Hook
The issue of fraud could be addressed by the United States court, “with all of the advanced legislative and common law apparatus available to it to do justice between the parties” (at [191]). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am by NCC Staff
Secretary of State 2001 Kofi Annan, former United Nations Secretary-General* 2000 James Watson and Francis Crick, Co-Discoverers of the Structure of DNA 1999 Kim Dae-jung, former President of South Korea* 1998 George J. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler
A variant on this argument is that trans individuals join the military only for gender-affirming care and will leave shortly after receiving operations, thus affecting unit cohesion and readiness. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:56 am by Durga Rao
In the only United Kingdom case in which this section has been successfully invoked, Mayer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:04 pm
Purepac Pharma, Faulding, Watson Pharma, Danbury Pharma, Teva, Zenith Labs, Ivax, Apotex, Torpharm and Eon Labs) United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (06-1572). [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm by Nadia Kayyali
The Court said that for a U.S. court to have jurisdiction to hear these ATS claims, the claims must “touch and concern” the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Ben
 Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Just in time for Murdoch’s visit, Tom Watson MP has released his new book, co-written with journalist Martin Hickman, Dial M for Murdoch. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  An arrest is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, but under a case called United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
(Delaware Supreme Court and Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Tags: Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]