Search for: "Weeks v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 38,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 4:07 pm
Just last week the... [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:10 am
Harper (the independent state legislature case), Akhil and Vik Amar have an amicus brief in this term's Moore v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 12:30 am
We generally pull a dogeared copy of Wilson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am
In what looked like an impossible hurdle to climb, the law firm of Grabel and Associates shocked the state of Michigan by winning their second decision before the Michigan Supreme Court in less than a 3-week time span when the highest court of the state overturned the “People v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:08 pm
Abbott and United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:24 pm
The petitions of the week are: Chieftain Royalty Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:24 pm
Last week the IL SCT, in Kakos v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:45 pm
Here is the Indictment returned late last week in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 9:02 pm
This is the second week of the April sitting. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:40 am
United States (09-837) • Respondent’s brief in Connick v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
The petitions of the week are: Peithman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:26 pm
This week at the CCAs: ACCA will hear oral argument on Thursday at 1210 at George Washington University’s law school The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:21 am
Wong, and United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:13 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:37 am
The petitions of the week are: Sample v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Below is a brief summary of the other cases considered by the Court this week: Apple Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:03 pm
This was strongly suggested in various White House comments over the last few weeks, but it's nice to see something official. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 7:40 am
The respondent’s merits brief in United States v. [read post]
