Search for: "Wells v. State of California" Results 441 - 460 of 12,249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am by Jennifer Lynch
Montana’s straightforward law went into effect two and a half years before California’s landmark privacy law, CalECPA, codified similar protections for location data—and five years before the Supreme Court, in Carpenter v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Supreme Court ruled on one aspect of video game ratings and sales in Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
Consistent with the Ninth Circuit's interpretation of California law, federal law and the law in many states, we conclude that such a promise may constitute a bribe. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
In comparison to other states, California boasts a higher number of statutes and regulations. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff brought this suit alleging violations of California's common carrier law, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, the California Unfair Competition Law, and the Federal Telecommunications Act, as well as claims alleging intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic relations, and negligence under California Civil Code § 2162. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am by John Coyle
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am by Peter Mahler
The burden then shifted to the petitioner to raise a question of fact as to whether the statute of limitations has been tolled or is otherwise inapplicable, or whether the petitioner actually commenced the proceeding within the applicable limitations period (see Edem v Wondemagegehu, 175 AD3d at 467; Coleman v Wells Fargo & Co. [read post]