Search for: "White v. Wear" Results 441 - 460 of 873
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 9:23 am by Simon Fodden
We meet her in Chapter V, The Wine Shop, where she sits, knits, and “sees nothing. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
It found no merit to the employer’s argument (premised on Justice White’s concurrence in Eastex v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The Post’s Reliable Source gossip column says that Ginsburg, “in a white doily-like collar and black sunglasses, looked as rock star as Prince. [read post]
30 May 2015, 4:21 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
”The TGI cited the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Eva Maria Painer. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
McCarty, Seventh Circuit: The district court erred in dismissing Appellant's Eighth Amendment claim arising from the requirement that he wear a see-through jump suit when being transported from a county jail to state prison. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am by Matt Kaiser
McCarty, Seventh Circuit: The district court erred in dismissing Appellant’s Eighth Amendment claim arising from the requirement that he wear a see-through jump suit when being transported from a county jail to state prison. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:15 pm
The defendant described her attacker as a white male wearing a hooded jacket and told the officer that his firearm was similar to the officer's. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
White, 593 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir.2010) (holding that Heller does not cast doubt on constitutionality of 18 USC § 922[g][9] ). [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
See People v Abaof, 187 Misc 2d 173, 185 (Crim Ct, New York County, 2001) (addressing defendants' facial challenge to PL § 240.35[4] before as-applied challenge; each as-applied claim was "based on the premise that the bandanas the defendants were wearing are entitled to protection under the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
  At 10 a.m. the Court will hear oral arguments in King v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am by SHG
In other words, Judge Kopf’s post of the 9th Circuit oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Hobbs, which involved a Muslim prisoner’s wearing a beard). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:00 pm by Eric Citron
It might be that the jurors were just less inclined to believe that Brown was shot for no reason because he is black, or more inclined to believe Wilson because he is white or wears blue. [read post]