Search for: "Wood v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 441 - 460
of 747
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
He specifically addressed our ability to address the two major strategic threats facing the United States: a rising China and weak, malevolent states. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:27 am
United States that when individuals act in their official capacity as corporate agents, they “cannot be said to be exercising their personal rights and duties nor to be entitled to their purely personal privileges. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. (1968), and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:26 am
Three pages later, the brief again states that "small businesses with fewer than fifty employees—96% of all firms in the United States—are exempt from the ACA requirement that employers provide health insurance to their employees." [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
” Records on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) show that on August 5, 2013, Tesla Motors, Inc. filed a trademark application for “Model E,” in several classes of goods, including that for “Automobiles and structural parts therefor. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:34 pm
Commissioner (1989), United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
Indeed, it’s not even clear that that is a federal question; it would appear to turn, instead, on matters of state corporation law--here, the laws of Pennsylvania (Conestoga Wood) and, perhaps, of Oklahoma (Hobby Lobby). 6. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores (13-354) and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
Commissioner (1989) and United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:53 pm
Having first spoken of the two jurisdiction types in International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Schs. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:42 am
United States – proof needed to convict an individual of bank fraud under federal law Wednesday, April 2: Fifth Third Bancorp. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
This issue has been considered in the United States since Watergate, but this case may be the first time it has been publicly observable here.10. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
The women who work for such churches thus are virtually the only women in the United States who will not be afforded this new national benefit, which I described in further detail in this post. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Are the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases about employee health insurance plan coverage of contraception, writ large, or—as the plaintiffs in those two cases would have it—“only” about coverage of “abortifacients,” or about four discrete forms of birth control? [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:09 pm
Omar (with the United States as the petitioner) and No. 66-1666, Munaf v. [read post]
