Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Furthermore, Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Pepper v Hart said that Article IX was ‘a provision of the highest constitutional importance’ which ‘should not be narrowly construed’. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 2:12 pm
In other words, the provision cannot be said to be manifestly without reasonable foundation. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
His words prevent justice being done. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
For Lord Kitchin, and the other judges that have so far considered Actavis, what matters now is less the meaning of the words in a claim, and more inventive concept that the claim seeks to protect.What about prosecution history? [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm
The House of Lords has held that this sort of sharing agreement does not create a tenancy (see AG Securities v Vaughan (1991) AC 417). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:44 am
In giving judgment, Lord Justice Gross carefully suggested that the Rules Committee should consider implementing a specific rule permitting such service on an officer of a company, where the fact that he is out of the jurisdiction is no bar to the making of a committal application. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context: “It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context:"It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
” Oh Lord, she was hostile. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
The claimant accepted that the defendants had published the words complained of in good faith and the defendants accept that the words were untrue. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, and Lord Lloyd-Jones. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:10 am
Lord Hughes gave the judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Phelan, 333 U.S. 6, 10 (1948), described as “a drastic measure and at times the equivalent of banishment or exile,” and in Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Phelan, 333 U.S. 6, 10 (1948), described as “a drastic measure and at times the equivalent of banishment or exile,” and in Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:47 pm
He and the other mighty British press baron of the time, Max Aitken (Lord Beaverbrook), were the inspiration, if that is the word, for Rudyard Kipling’s celebrated condemnation: [The press exercises] power without responsibility: the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 4:28 am
This depends on the wording of the trust deed. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:12 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Dante Alighieri(c. 1265–c. 1321)In the year 1300, at age 35, the narrator of Dante’s Inferno famously finds himself in trouble: Midway in our life’s journey, I went astray from the straight road and woke to find myself alone in a dark wood. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:30 am
An advance alert from Oxford Journal brings word of the posting of Judicial Intervention in Early Corporate Governance Disputes: Vice-Chancellor Shadwell’s Lost Judgment in Mozley v Alston (1847), by Victoria Barnes in the American Journal of Legal History:Mozley v Alston is usually used in Anglo-American corporate law as an authority to demonstrate the premise that courts are reluctant to intervene in disputes between shareholders and directors. [read post]
