Search for: "York v. Daniels" Results 441 - 460 of 1,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
  The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, Slate, Education Week, and Reuters also provide coverage. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:38 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Two op-eds published today highlight the philosophical debate over the impact of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:52 am by Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz
  Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C. represented the Planning Board in the appellate proceedings of Kirquel Development, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:52 am by Amy Howe
  Covering the case for The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that the Justices were “skeptical” of the patent, an assessment shared by Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Daniel Mullin also has coverage for JURIST. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Circuit raising First Amendment issues] Let’s try correcting the New York Times on drug pricing. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
” At Article 8, Daniel Hensel weighs in on Shapiro v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
Adam Liptak has an article in the New York Times on the January 11th oral argument scheduled in Briscoe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
"  On January 18, 2012, Judge Daniels of the District Court referred the case to the Magistrate for general pretrial purposes and to issue a report and recommendation regarding any dispositive motions. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
DeFranco v Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 30952(U) March 28, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 150188/2018 Judge: James E. d’Auguste describes what happens when cases are shuttled between the initial attorneys and “trial counsel”, which in this particular situation means a law firm that took all of the initial attorneys’ cases and worked them up for trial. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:00 am by Karen Tani
It is part cultural history, part painstaking reconstruction of the precedent-setting UK divorce case Robinson v. [read post]