Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 8,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
v=IIGyVa5Xftw#t=49 At the heart of the takedown decision is a fight over fair use in copyrights when mixed with commercial speech. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:40 am
Wainwright and Strickland v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:31 am
The opinion is styled, Gregory Young v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:00 pm
United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm
On March 7, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Skinner v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
” Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
Young, 466 S.W.2d 381, 388 (Tex. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 10:12 am
Citing Young v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 3:38 am
Per Opala v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am
Justice Markman, joined by Justices Corrigan, Hathaway, and Young, delivered the opinion of the Court, overturning its 1982-decision in Silva v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 4:34 am
They have had disappointing line play this year, and they are young. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 5:12 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
First, under the doctrine of Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), Congress can authorize private suits for prospective injunctions requiring state officials to uphold federal copyright law. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:20 pm
In Tann v Bennett, --- Fed. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:29 am
I contemplated a post about the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
