Search for: "v. Holder et al"
Results 441 - 460
of 924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWALT INC. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
Holder, and Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:46 am
Let me just quote from a very recent ruling written by Chief Judge Rader, Douglas Dynamics v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:12 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Litman The decision in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Citing Monsanto Co. v Scruggs et Al., the court held that the purchaser of a patented technologies which can replicate itself is not authorised to use replicated copies of it, as this practice 'would eviscerate the rights of the patent holder'. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
Cook-Deegan et al., Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: Comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers, GENET. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:52 am
Holder) and race-based affirmative action (in Fisher v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:07 pm
Abdouch v. [read post]
