Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 4581 - 4600 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am by kylew
  Intel Corp., Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer Inc. were among the companies that supported Roche. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:59 pm
by Elisabeth Lorio The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana’s decision to grant partial summary judgment in favor of the operator co-owner in a dispute over liability after a fellow co-owner’s assignment of lease interests governed by joint operating agreements (JOAs). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Gustafson (Divorce and Custody)Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:41 pm
After the action was filed, F&R recorded its Security Agreement against WYD’s thirteen trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”).F&R eventually was granted summary judgment in its state court breach of contract action and the court awarded F&R $348,651.18 [ed. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 8:04 am by Joseph M. Hallman
Daikin”), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) reversed a decision made by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm by David Cheifetz
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCRIMINAL PRACTICENo Reversible Error in Decision Not to Re-Sentence Pursuant to 'Crosby' After Remand United States, appellee v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
GOOGLE, INC., Defendant, and FISH &;amp; RICHARDSON P.C., Defendant, Counterclaimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. [read post]