Search for: "Doe VI " Results 4581 - 4600 of 5,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am by Eleonora Rosati
Amazon.com DOES target the UK when it makes it as “painless” as possible for UK consumers to buy from itLifestyle Equities v Amazon UK Services Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 552 (May 2022)The first instance decision in this case appeared in Volume IX. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:00 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The admissibility of the appealIn view of the facts set out at points I, V and VI above, the board finds that the appeal satisfies the admissibility criteria under the EPC and is thus admissible.2. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am by Benjamin Wittes
Editor’s note: Over the next week, Lawfare will be running a series of essays on federalist governance in the Middle East. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  That responsibility remains a negligence duty of care, as eliminating the traditional negligence standard of proof would “ill-serve” the public:This consideration, however, does not justify the courts in lowering the standards of proof in tort cases of this kind. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 5:11 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
We worked together to get the Department of Public Safety to change its rules vis-a-vis the driver responsibility surcharge which is an extra civil penalty that drivers must pay for three years on top of fines for DWIs and certain traffic tickets. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Perhaps “prudence” dictates waiting until such a bill of particulars can be presented, but the theoretical case for what I call “Wilsonian self-determination” does not depend on oppression. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by Jessica Kroeze
If during the priority year a European patent application - filed by applicant A - is transferred to a party B, is then the priority claim from a subsequent application (from which the patent in suit matured) by applicant A to the earlier application valid? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm by Lucy Reed
Below is an article of mine published in Family Law Journal in July of this year, reproduced with kind permission of Jordans. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
But, to stir up trouble, I find myself pondering now: What metric should be used to identify a ‘good’ trademark lawyer vis-a-vis other trademark lawyers (at least in the context of prosecution)? [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
… Part VI: Freedom of religion in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms As explained above, the majority of challenges to the desecration of Aboriginal sacred sites have proceeded under section 35 of the Constitution and/or specific statutes (eg planning or forestry legislation) and they have largely failed. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Does this instruction extend to non-GAAP financial information that does not relate to the disclosure of target levels, but is nevertheless included in Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A) or other parts of the proxy statement — for example, to explain how pay is structured and implemented to reflect the registrant’s or a named executive officer’s performance? [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
Updated H-V, 2.7 instead instructs examiners to issue summons to oral proceedings if an applicant does not implement the requested description amendments. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
§1981 and/or Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:18 am by Roy Ginsburg
Under the new regulations, though, an employee does not have to show that the impairment the employer bases its action upon is an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, only that the employer took the employment action due to its belief regarding the employee’s impairment. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am by Brian E. Barreira
§ 541(b)(1)) provides that ‘Property of the estate does not include any power that the debtor may only exercise solely for the benefit of an entity other than the debtor. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:08 pm by Michael Gerhardt
It does not establish exemptions for Supreme Court appointments during election years. [read post]