Search for: "Doe v. Brown" Results 4581 - 4600 of 5,972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 1:01 pm by Stefanie Levine
  Express language setting duration does not require a specific number of years. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am by Steve Bainbridge
  Moreover, the presence of a staggered board does not change the analysis. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Public employee not always entitled to a name-clearing hearingBrown v Simmons, 478 F.3d 922The lesson in Brown v Simmons is that a public employee is not entitled to a name-clearing hearing to rebut statements of a defamatory nature except when he or she has been terminated by the employer. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
Alas, our intrepid judge concludes on page 18 of his decision that Rooker-Feldman does in fact preclude him from looking further into the issues that underlie the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Peter Rost
Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, would be sending a letter of recommendation for Rost as well as several other candidates for the post. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Does it now result in just a single conviction? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:10 am by Steve Lombardi
Nevertheless, convenience stores in particular locations can be vulnerable to repeat victimization, especially those types of retailers that have large amounts of cash, low security, and few staff and customers likely to resist.5 Wertz' case is Brown v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  It does not appear in the list of Supreme Court “Current Cases” and does not seem to have been listed for a hearing. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:00 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Juveniles TPR; voluntariness of plea Because a finding of parental unfitness does not necessarily result in an involuntary termination of parental rights, circuit courts are not obligated to inform a parent that by pleading no contest, she waives her constitutional right to parent. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:51 am by WSLL
Stat. 18-5-305 does require each board of county commissioners to adopt rules and regulations necessary to implement the subdivision act, and Sheridan County has adopted such rules and regulations. [read post]