Search for: "Does, 1-25" Results 4581 - 4600 of 18,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2015, 9:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
WWS argued that this challenge technically does not regard “an erroneous interpretation of the Ordinance,” as is required for appeals of certificates of occupancy pursuant to section 1003–1, and therefore that section 1003–1 provided no authority for Desfosses’s appeal. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm by jslawcenter
What that 1 SDIP point means is that the insurance company can/will raise your rate by 25% (ouch!). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:53 pm by Anthony Zaller
Labor Code section 2810.3 states that “client employer” does not include any of the following companies based on size: (i) A business entity with a workforce of fewer than 25 workers, including those hired directly by the client employer and those obtained from, or provided by, any labor contractor. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:12 pm by Carolyn Elefant
(March 25, 2007) And, if you want to see the great work that solos are doing, take a look at this inspiring video and the dozen featured solos... e="http://www.youtube.com/v/PI2VLENTUaI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"> If the video moves too quickly to digest, you can see the slides on Slideshare. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
USDA says if ASF does reach the USA, it will have a “significant impact on U.S. livestock producers, their communities, and the economy. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:45 pm
The reports included 1 rape, 2 robberies, 1 assault, 21burglaries, 43 incidents of domestic violence, 1 bias crime, and 36 cases of police force. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:34 am by Y. Michael Yin, JD
Note that the way to write a date in appellate documents is day – month – year (e.g., 25 December 2019). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:45 pm
 Figure 1 below displays the total federal tax burden of households by income quintile and for the top 1 percent of income earners since 1979, using Congressional Budget Office data:  As Figure 1 shows, every income group saw decreased effective tax rates after Clinton left office. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:41 am
 As has been widely reported, a March 25, 2009 report by the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:57 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Among 18-25s, yes is ahead 31-23 with a whopping 46% undecided.None of this is reason to get complacent, though. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 6:41 pm by Richard Posner
If a person who earns $1 million a year and is taxed at an effective rate of 25 percent is subjected to such an imposition, instead of paying $250,000 in taxes he will have to pay $300,000, and he will therefore do whatever it takes to reduce his income from $1 million to $999,999, as that will save him $49,999. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm by Mary Elizabeth Williams
Sources: “Chalk Activist Triumphs over Big Bank,” Hyperallergic, July 1, 2013; “Not guilty verdict for San Diego chalk protestor,” Salon, July 1, 2013; “Chalking the plank: Judge won’t allow bank protestor to claim first amendment rights,” San Diego Reader, June 25, 2013; MacKinney v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In the present case, the debit order does not explicitly refer to any decision, nor does it contain a request defining the subject of the appeal. [read post]