Search for: "English v. English" Results 4581 - 4600 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 10:00 am by Ronald Mann
PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY:  The Court this week in Freeman v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Moffat in effect submitted, the Appellants betrayed ample familiarity with English in their various dealings with the court system. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Moffat in effect submitted, the Appellants betrayed ample familiarity with English in their various dealings with the court system. [read post]
Merck Sharp & Dohme (C-119/22) made by the Finnish Market Court in February 2022 (see here for an English translation of the referring decision) and Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm by Wolfgang Demino
   2  VCG and its affiliates have been represented by McCarter & English in at least one other Trust-related matter. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm by Wolfgang Demino
   2  VCG and its affiliates have been represented by McCarter & English in at least one other Trust-related matter. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm
Clause 15 (English version, 22 January 2019) Some of our Services allow you to upload, submit, store, send or receive content. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am by centerforartlaw
By Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad On May 15, 2023, in a landmark decision for Italy’s cultural heritage property protection, Florence’s Gallerie dell’Accademia prevailed in its legal battle to secure its image rights to Michelangelo’s iconic David sculpture.[1] The Gallerie initiated the lawsuit against the publishing house Edizioni Conde Nast, who appropriated the 16th-century sculpture’s likeness three years prior for the cover of GQ Italia in an “openly advertising… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am by Anita Davies
Although much of the case law referred to (including Buscarini & Ors v San Marino (1999) 30 EHRR 208) concerned the freedom not to hold religious rather than political beliefs, the principles expressed in those cases applied in this instance. [read post]