Search for: "Exist Inc" Results 4581 - 4600 of 25,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2021, 5:17 am by Rob Robinson
About Cloud Court Cloud Court, Inc. is a LegalTech company formed by litigation professionals. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
" -- this Kat has only just got round to writing up the decision of Mrs Justice Proudman, of the Chancery Division (England and Wales) in Future Publishing Ltd v Edge Interactive Media Inc, Edge Games Inc and Dr Timothy Langdell [2011] EWHC 1489 (Ch), the sort of case which makes this Kat at any rate very pleased he doesn't have to deal with litigants in person (as was the third defendant in this case), despite his fabled patience. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Separate concurring opinions were filed by Justices Baxter and Chin (Ayala v Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc, June 30, 2014, Werdegar, K). [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:41 am
As a result, the companies then attempted to negotiate an out-of-court restructuring to convert "a large portion" of the existing first lien debt and all of the existing second lien debt to equity. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:52 am
Oct. 23, 2008), Michael Penzer alleged that Southeast Wireless Inc. had violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al, 585 F.3d 890 (5th Cir., October 19, 2009). [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 10:00 am by Josh H. Escovedo
Fashion houses Fendi and Marc Jacobs have been sued for trademark infringement in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by another clothing company known as Roma Costumes, Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:40 am by Kara M. Maciel
 The EEOC believes that these policies prevent the employer and employee from engaging in an interactive process to determine the existence of reasonable accommodation as required by the ADA. [read post]
  In commenting on the agreement, Meratas noted that because the legal status of ISAs is unclear under existing federal and state laws, the company determined it was prudent to be proactive at the state level, starting with California. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:11 pm by Mark Tabakman
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and was brought in federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
Ultimately, the Board held that “[t]here is no independent statutory obligation to check off and remit dues after expiration of a collective bargaining agreement containing a checkoff provision, just as no such obligation exists before parties enter into such an agreement. [read post]