Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 6,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2011, 11:17 am
The husband objected to entry of the QDROs prepared by wife’s divorce lawyer because they allowed passive gains and losses on the wife’s share of the retirement funds and transferred her share on a pro rata basis. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:53 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm
” Flores v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 10:57 am
While the husband and wife were married, the husband’s parents gave him a significant amount of shares in the family business. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:01 am
The New Jersey divorce judge was correct in denying the ex-husband's request to have his new wife represent him against his ex-wife in their post-judgment litigation. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:29 am
In response to the husband’s motion, the wife alleged that the investment scheme was foreseeable at the time of the final decree and, thus, should not constitute a material change in circumstances. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
Lassett, 768 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), the husband tesified that his wife's jewelry was valued at $10,000. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:25 am
" In a recent appellate division case, Knips v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm
He had the difficult task of telling his wife, who knew nothing of this aspect of her husband’s sex life, and who was devastated. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:57 pm
Woodfield and his then-wife (Kristina Dokka) resided in Mississippi from July 2006 to April 2007. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:50 am
More difficult is the wife’s argument that the husband’s diminished income from his business is not a change, because he anticipated it. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
v=zDZFcDGpL4U&feature=player_embedded3. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:29 am
This “list” was in my husband's business daily planner -- not meant for me to see, I don't know what it means, but if anything happens to me, he would be my first suspect. . . . [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
The trial court was instructed to consider the wife's needs and the husband's ability to pay during the retroactive time period sought by the wife in determining whether the wife's retroactive alimony request is appropriate. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 1:40 pm
In a recent decision, Wilson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
A Michigan man, Leon Walker, was recently charged with invasion of privacy after reading his wife's email on a computer they shared. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
Eventually he died and his wife began in vitro fertilization giving birth to twins eighteen months after her husband's death. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:49 pm
In Higginbotham v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:51 pm
Husband and wife. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
The Basic Facts: This is a declaratory judgment action in which the claimants sought a declaration that the wife’s loss of consortium claim related to injuries sustained as a result of her husband’s work-related injury is not subject to a workers’ compensation lien. [read post]
