Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 9,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 5:38 pm
The meanings of words change over time, and it’s important to know what you’re really trying to say while finding the right words to use. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Rosenberg v 206 Bloor Street West Limited, 2016 ONSC 6 [146] In retrospect, the defendants may rue the day when they unleashed the plaintiff on their suppliers rather than spending the time to work on her designs with her and collect standard samples for each design element and samples for those items where upgrades would be offered to her. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
… Whether the case is designated as complex or handled as a summary action, Family Part judges have broad discretion to permit, deny, or limit discovery in accordance with the circumstances of the individual case. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm
Grants made during the year are not re-evaluated to provide additional funds to applicants, but those who apply are informed at the time when they receive their grants that additional applications may be presented during the year. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:25 am
McCarthy doesn’t like Hyundai, and neither does Judge Furman, because the Hyundai court failed to notice the distinction between association and dilution. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Examine the roadkill to see the path we’re on. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
In re Stroming’s Will, 12 N.J. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Especially since everyone agrees, and that includes Judge Callahan, that we're not talking about strict scrutiny here: that's not the test.So is applying the Central Hudson test inconsistent with Sorrell (which, I'll reiterate, did precisely that to the actual case before it)? [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
In re Stroming’s Will, 12 N.J. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:19 pm
I’m kind of tired of In re Tam also. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
Baker, County Court Judge, dismissed the indictment with leave to re-present. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
As discussed here, in a October 23, 2015 opinion , New York (New York County) Supreme Court Judge Charles E. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
They are, in reality, asking the Court to reverse itself and re-implement the strict-scrutiny standard it rejected more than twenty years ago in Casey. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:54 am
I am not privy to the internal deliberations of Apple or Google or any other company that is (re-)designing its systems without exceptional access capabilities. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
While this “stop selling” or “never sell” theory has been labeled in various ways (including “fraud on the FDA”) to meet the plaintiff’s particular needs, it seems to us like a re-framing of design defect, albeit without pesky requirements like a feasible alternative design, no liability with adequate (or without inadequate) warnings, or proximate cause. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm
So if you’re going to drink—or maybe eat a lot of carbs—recruit a designated driver. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 12:01 pm
The better choice is to have a designated driver from the get-go. [read post]
