Search for: "Johns v. Johns" Results 4581 - 4600 of 33,733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” He did write that the residual clause of the ACCA (18 USC § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii)) would classify Borden as a career criminal, but noted that the 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
This trend appears to be the answer to the initial challenge posed by John Ruggie as he sought to produce a framework for business and human rights--the core problem of governance gaps in a world legal order in which national law tends to be constrained by the territorial character of sovereign authority. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:09 am by Gene Takagi
” ProPublica“President Biden, in his first trip abroad since taking office, arrives in Europe today with a daunting agenda: Reassure allies that the hostility of the Trump years was a momentary aberration in U.S. policy, coax them toward coordinated policies on Russia, China, global warming and the coronavirus, and then confront Vladimir V. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Orin Kerr explained what the Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am by Howard Knopf
 There was a Q&A and the moderator, John Cotter, put forward the gist of my questions, which were as follows:Why are no Copyright Board decisions before 2020 available on CANLII? [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 4:30 pm by Howard Bashman
” And online at The Christian Science Monitor, Seth Stern has a review of the book headlined “The US Supreme Court’s ‘Great Dissenter’ repudiated ‘separate but equal’; Justice John Marshall Harlan’s dissents, like the one in Plessy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:56 am by Ion Meyn
At the heart of the rule-resistant narrative is Graham v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As case after case comes before the court, challenging his core values, John makes a fateful decision: He breaks with his colleagues in fundamental ways, becoming the nation’s prime defender of the rights of Black people, immigrant laborers, and people in distant lands occupied by the United States.Harlan’s dissents, particularly in Plessy v. [read post]