Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 4581 - 4600 of 8,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Lord Toulson then turned to a second line of argument, first developed by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in King v American Airlines. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:58 am
From the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:28 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The challenged ruling, a “Final Administrative Order” issued by the ARB on May 8, 2012 (OFCCP v Frito-Lay, Inc, ARB Case No 2010-132), reversed a 2010 ruling by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ Case No 2010-OFC-002) in favor of Frito-Lay. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:43 am by Steve Baird
Marketing, creative and design types should pay close attention to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision in Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
Eastern University, in Pennsylvania, lays claim to that phrase, again for uses in connection with educational services". [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
The cases of People v Reed and People v Boscic held that the statute differentiates between a preliminary field test and a chemical breath test, which is admissible at trial with the laying of a proper foundation. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:24 am
Now here's a case name from the past: Arsenal Football Club v Matthew Reed. [read post]