Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V" Results 4581 - 4600 of 8,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
The Georgia Court of Appeals just handed down a verdict in First Bank of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:00 am by Tony Allen
Indeed, in responding to one invitation, the defendants reportedly went so far as to acknowledge being aware of the penalties that might be imposed for unreasonable refusal, but said:“[W]e are confident that in a matter in which our clients are extremely confident of their position and do not consider that there is any realistic prospect that your client will succeed, the rejection is entirely reasonable. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the employee failed to identify a clear mandate of public policy that was violated by his discharge for violating the employer’s workplace violence policy, the employer was granted its motion to dismiss (Altschuld v CVS Caremark Corp, July 10, 2014, Quarles, W). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, on November 25, 2013, Northern District of Georgia Judge Thomas W. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
In particular, HHS notes the statement that “[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity. [read post]