Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Based on Professor Mary Waters’ testimony before Congress in 1997, I reported that “over 93 percent of whites and blacks choose same-race partners as do 70 percent of Asians and Latinos and 33 percent of Native Americans. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
(Disclosure: I submitted an amicus brief with Mark Feldman, who was closely involved in the FSIA’s drafting and passage, explaining why the FSIA should not be read to affect criminal prosecutions, and why international law in the form of federal common law does not exempt foreign state-owned enterprises from criminal jurisdiction.) [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:07 pm
This event marked a turning point in the nature of student protest. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 3:51 pm
I have spent some time with Justice Harlan's papers at the Library of Congress. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:33 am
But this misses the mark on two counts. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:00 am
” “I remember that, during this time, I found myself rather running dry of conversation. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 3:21 am
And at the same time, in Congress, Sens. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
" Armistice Day was primarily a day set aside to honor veterans of World War I, but in 1954, after World War II had required the greatest mobilization of soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen in the Nation’s history; after American forces had fought aggression in Korea, the 83rd Congress, at the urging of the veterans service organizations, amended the Act of 1938 by striking out the word "Armistice" and inserting in its place the word "Veterans. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:41 am
” Armistice Day was primarily a day set aside to honor veterans of World War I, but in 1954, after World War II had required the greatest mobilization of soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen in the Nation’s history; after American forces had fought aggression in Korea, the 83rd Congress, at the urging of the veterans service organizations, amended the Act of 1938 by striking out the word “Armistice” and inserting in its place the word “Veterans. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:50 am
Senator Jeff Sessions seems to have been persuaded that this was a significant mark on her character. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:10 am
” Armistice Day was primarily a day set aside to honor veterans of World War I, but in 1954, after World War II had required the greatest mobilization of soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen in the Nation’s history; after American forces had fought aggression in Korea, the 83rd Congress, at the urging of the veterans service organizations, amended the Act of 1938 by striking out the word “Armistice” and inserting in its place the word “Veterans. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:52 am
” Armistice Day was primarily a day set aside to honor veterans of World War I, but in 1954, after World War II had required the greatest mobilization of soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen in the Nation’s history; after American forces had fought aggression in Korea, the 83rd Congress, at the urging of the veterans service organizations, amended the Act of 1938 by striking out the word “Armistice” and inserting in its place the word “Veterans. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:02 am
– John’s risk factor tips In this 13-minute episode with EY Partner and former Corp Fin Chief Accountant Mark Kronforst, Dave and Mark examine the Reg S-X amendments for disclosure about acquisitions & dispositions, including: – How significant are these changes to Regulation S-X for public companies? [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
It marked the first and only time anyone had prevailed in a lawsuit challenging President George W. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
S. 526, 534 (2004) (internal quotation marks omitted), not defer to some conflicting reading the government might advance. . . . [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 5:02 am
This policy fully utilizes the tools Congress has given us. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:32 pm
At oral argument, the appellant’s counsel quickly argued that the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Crist is a “sweeping constitutional decision,” and that Congress, even acting pursuant to its Article I authority to regulate the land and naval forces, cannot draw the line for double jeopardy in a place later than at the point where the members are sworn and assembled. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
§1396r-8(g)(l)(B)(i), and 42 C.F.R §423.100).Neither Cetrotide for granulose cell tumor or Increlex for muscular dystrophy appeared in these compendia. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
An interview that Charlie Savage and Mark Landler of the New York Times held with State Department legal advisor Harold Koh sheds at least some light on the matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:21 am
I could go on, but what’s the point? [read post]
