Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4581 - 4600
of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
""At the time they filed their application, they knew they were seeking a registration for their mark in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
MICHAEL GRIFFITH, No. 08-3668-cvUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2009 U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 11:21 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:13 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:25 pm
In, Kenneth Eugene Smith v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
| When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark | BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick trade mark battle | Influencers and undisclosed sponsored activities: where do we stand? [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Starting with the seminal case, Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 6:21 am
On August 9, 2016, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued Lucia v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:15 am
NanoChem Sol’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:31 am
Here in SHAHRAM DAVID LAVIAN, -v.- IRA DANIEL TOKAYER, ESQ., 08 Civ. 938 (PAC) (GWG); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 7:42 am
" (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:34 am
During a spatial analysis of a number of the 82 amicus curiae briefs to Kiobel v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 6:22 pm
In the recent decision in Florida v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
The 83-page complaint (full text) in Blackmon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:07 pm
Patent and Trademark Office, as well as state registrations issued by Indiana and Illinois. [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:51 am
The decision to hold the return date hearing in public is in keeping with the approach of the Court of Appeal in these types of cases but marks a departure from the normal practice adopted by judges in first instance hearings. [read post]
