Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 7,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 12:29 pm
Reid v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:13 pm
This argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:37 am
State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:01 pm
Fred Carries Contracts, Inc., 191 Ariz. 247, 955 P.2d 3 (App. 1997), Nat'l Ass'n of Radiation Survivors, 115 F.R.D. at 557 (citing Cecil Corley Motor Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
" On December 5, 2008, long after SCHECHTER provided BREYTMAN with a copy of the file, BREYTMAN served SCHECHTER with a subpoena for the original file, in connection with another of his pro se actions against the landlord, ALEXANDER BREYTMAN v OLINVILLE REALTY LLC and WEINER REALTY, Supreme Court, Kings County, Index No. 2423/06 [exhibit G of motion]. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 4:57 pm
See, e.g., Oliver v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:28 am
” (Id. at p. 1319.) [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:48 am
Stuart v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:09 am
Lanfair v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:09 am
Lanfair v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
” (Oceanside, supra, 58 Cal.2d at p. 185, fn. 4.) [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Vehicle Intelligence and Safety as well as Cloud Satchel also raise Section 101 challenges, but those cases are battling long odds. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm
This is consistent with the fiduciary relationship between the doctor and the patient (CPSO, Practice Guide/a>, p.5; Norberg v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Leila Sophie AR, LLC(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court W D Washington: Bench trial finds 'Spiderlift' infringes 'Spider' for hoisting equipment: SafeWorks, LLC v Teupen America, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court W D Washington grants summary judgment against HendrixLicensing.com (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Supreme Court strikes blow to NFL's long-standing licensing venture: American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:44 am
USA Waste of California, Inc., April 7, 2017, Pregerson, P.). [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Elections Posted by Michael Sozan, Center for American Progress, on Friday, December 6, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
The General Court recited several provisions of Commission Regulation EC 2868/95, which refer to a specific time frame within which the request for proof of genuine use should be made, and held that [according to this Kat's translation]: [34] According to previous case law, the earlier mark is presumed to have been put to genuine use as long as the applicant does not request proof of that use; said request shall be made expressly and timeously to OHIM. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
A very interesting decision today from the Iowa Supreme Court, in Bandstra v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Fordyce v. [read post]
